PRESS RELEASE
COUNCIL MEMBER JEN RUGGLES SAYS CORPORATION COUNSEL OPINION INADEQUATE ON CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR WAR CRIMES
Says Opinion Does not Conform to the Rules of Professional Conduct and Legal Standards
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
For more information contact: Jen Ruggles
Phone: 808-961-8263
Email: Jen.Ruggles@hawaiicounty.gov
Hilo, HI- Council member Jen Ruggles released a letter today in response to Corporation Counsel Joe Kamelamela’s opinion regarding possible criminal liability for war crimes. In a letter on Corporation Counsel letterhead dated August 22, 2018, Kamelamela’s answer consisted of two sentences stating, “we opine that you will not incur criminal liability under state, federal and international law. See Article VI, Constitution of the United States of America (international law cannot violate federal law).”
Council member Ruggles, stated that she had been advised by her attorney that Kamelamela’s answer was inconsistent with Rule 1.1 of the Hawai‘i Rules of Professional Conduct that applies to all licensed attorneys including government lawyers such as Corporation Counsel. The rule requires, “Competent handling of a particular matter [which] includes inquiry into and analysis of the factual and legal elements of the problem, and use of methods and procedures meeting the standards of competent practitioners.”
Last week Ruggles had sent a letter to Mr. Kamelamela requesting he assure her that she was not incurring criminal liability under international humanitarian law and United States Federal law as a Council member for legislating and being complicit in the collection of taxes, foreclosures, and criminal prosecutions that appeared to be in violation of the U.S. Constitution and international humanitarian law.
Ruggles said she had retained legal counsel, Stephen Laudig, to be sure that her concerns received proper consideration. She said her attorney had advised her to refrain from legislating until Mr. Kamelamela has assured her she was not incurring criminal liability for the alleged war crime of enacting American law within the occupied territory of the Hawaiian Kingdom. According to Black’s Law Dictionary, the legal definition of “assure” is to “make certain and put beyond all doubt.”
Ruggles said Laudig advised her that Kamelamela’s answer was a conclusory statement unsupported by any facts and analysis and not a legal opinion. Therefore, Laudig stated that Kamelamela’s “letter provides no analysis, or argument making it something other than a legal opinion in the sense that it marshals no facts or law to reach a reasoned position.”
Laudig also pointed out to Kamelamela that his statement that “international law cannot violate federal law”, was not a true statement. He went on to further state that Kamelamela’s statement was a similar conclusion made by U.S. Department of Justice Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo in his now infamous legal opinion regarding Application of Treaties and Laws to al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees dated January 9, 2002. Like Council member Ruggles who is concerned of incurring criminal liability, the General Counsel for the U.S. Department of Defense was also concerned about the incurring of criminal liability under international treaties and federal laws on the treatment of individuals detained by the U.S. Armed Forces during the conflict in Afghanistan. Yoo’s conclusion in his legal opinion stated “that neither the federal War Crimes Act [18 U.S.C. §2441] nor the Geneva Conventions would apply.”
Laudig states to Kamelamela that “Yoo’s legal opinion was found to be flawed and allegations of war crimes against Yoo and those relying on his opinion, arose in Germany in 2006, Spain in 2009, and Russia in 2013. After the United States Senate Intelligence Committee Report on CIA torture was released in December 2014, Erwin Chemerinsky, who at the time was Dean of the University of California, Irvine School of Law, called for the prosecution of Yoo for his role in authoring, as well as co-authoring, what came to be known as the Torture Memos.”
Laudig cautioned Kamelamela as to how he should “answer Council member Ruggles’ inquiries, because she is not the only member of the County Council that could be affected by your legal opinion.”
Council member Ruggles’ attorney reminded Kamelamela that the Office of the Corporation Counsel is tasked with giving legal counsel on matters related to the official powers and duties of Council members. He reminded Kamelamela that her request was made in her official capacity seeking legal advice in order to assure her that she was not incurring criminal liability under international humanitarian law and United States Federal law as a Council member for:
- Participating in legislation of the Hawai‘i County Council that would appear to be in violation of Article 43 of the Hague Regulations and Article 64 of the Geneva Convention where the laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom must be administered and not the laws of the United States;
- Being complicit in the collection of taxes from protected persons that stem from legislation enacted by the Hawai‘i County Council, which would appear to be in violation of Article 28 and 47 of the Hague Regulations and Article 33 of the Geneva Convention where pillaging is prohibited;
- Being complicit in the foreclosures of properties of protected persons for delinquent property taxes that stem from legislation enacted by the Hawai‘i County Council, which would appear to be in violation of Article 28 and 47 of the Hague Regulations and Article 33 of the Geneva Convention where pillaging is prohibited, as well as in violation of Article 46 of the Hague Regulations and Articles 50 and 53 of the Geneva Convention where private property cannot be confiscated; and
- Being complicit in the criminal prosecution of protected persons for committing misdemeanors or felonies that stem from legislation enacted by the Hawai‘i County Council, which would appear to be in violation of 147 of the Geneva Convention where protected persons are prohibited from being unlawfully confined, and cannot be denied a fair and regular trial by a tribunal with competent jurisdiction.
Council member Ruggles stated that Corporation Counsel’s letter did not comply with her request for a legal opinion. Her attorney compared the quality of Kamelamela’s letter of the 22nd to a previous 5 page much more thorough opinion on a much simpler matter dated November 3, 2017 involving a grant she wanted to provide for a community center titled Orchidland Neighbors CRF Grant Follow-up that included sections on background, facts, analysis, and a conclusion. She says for this grant Kamelamela had provided a legal opinion that appeared to have met the standard of professional conduct and that she was anticipating a response of similar quality. She also referred to a 12-page opinion by Kamelamela’s predecessor, Lincoln Ashida, which also included facts, analysis, and a conclusion to then Council member Bob Jacobson dated May 26, 2004, regarding Article III, Section 3-2, Hawai‘i County Charter WRK. NO. 03-3641
During last week’s Council Committee meetings on August 21, 2018, Kamelamela admitted that he had not yet read her 9-page letter, and Ruggles says that she was taken aback by Kamelamela’s uninformed comments made, which insinuated she was involved with Native Hawaiian sovereignty groups and that is what had motivated her inquiry.
She stated Kamelamela’s comments “struck me as improper and not what I would expect from a professional tasked with the responsibilities of his office nor from an attorney speaking to an elected official in public.”
She went on to state:
“I represent my constituents from District 5, and swore to support and defend the U.S. Constitution. If Kamelamela had read the letter before voicing his opinion on my legitimate request, he would have clearly known that the native Hawaiian sovereignty movement is unrelated to the issue of potential liability for war crimes. The memorandum opinion of Dr. deZayas, was not from a sovereignty group, but from a United Nations Independent Expert. His use of the terms ‘plundering’, ‘enabling’, and ‘colluding’ are precise legal terms associated with criminal activity for violating the Hague and Geneva Conventions. I do not take this memorandum lightly, nor should he.”
In Laudig’s response to Kamelamela, he states, “This letter is in the nature of a follow up reminder and opportunity to provide what could be described as a ‘proper’ legal opinion which would include…meeting the standards of competent practitioners’ as the Hawai‘i Rules of Professional Conduct outlines.”
Ruggles says, “until Corporation Counsel provides her with a proper legal opinion responding to the statement of facts, consistent with the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct, and the legal definition of assurance that I am not incurring criminal liability under U.S. law and international law, which includes the 1907 Hague Regulations and the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV, I painfully regret I have been advised by my attorney that I must continue to refrain from legislating.”
Ruggles added, “I will be holding a townhall meeting on this issue shortly, and as always, welcome our constituents’ concerns, questions, and ideas on any issue. I am available to them and will continue to work hard in providing transparency and accountability in government.”
I would like to be notified of the townhall meeting….When, where and what time.
mahalo for doing the right thing. us kanaka are relieved that we have an honest american
These considerations desearve the notice of our intire island community. For far too long the issues profiled here have been mendaciously, even criminally kept from the public discourse by the powerful agencies of the occupying power. All due recognition of the courageous and pono activities taken up by Councilperson Ruggles are heralded here. Aloha ‘aina ea ea
The simple fact that the corporation counsel did not have a letter already drafted for this day is apathetic to the needs of all the council members. This is local gov 101.
A detailed letter outlining the ways corporation counsel protects council members from such situations should have been presented. Our local clans protect our elders by promising to represent them in court for example. Does the two sentence reply serve to avoid writing anything incriminating?
If this is how they act under light, it would be best to start looking more closely in the shadows. Your local gov is compromised. If the county does not already have a bond in place to pay for legal fees in this case, they have failed their fiduciary responsibilities.
How embarrassing it must be for them to wake up realizing that they have failed to indemnify and hold harmless the people they represent.
How did you get the courage to speak up and ask if it’s legal?
More shame on your imperial/americano dictators.
I have come to the conclusion that life on Hawaii Island is a constant vacuum, where laws are on the books, but sporadically recognized, nor enforced. The ideals of the Hawaiians, as well as of American are familiar, but not engrained in people’s lives, such as fully grasping t the concept of refraining from taking a nything that does not belong to you, even if you know you won’t get caught, not associating with those that do, not making excuses to justify such action taken by one’s self or a friend or family member, and whether or not a property has not been lived in for a while, not quick to justify stealing anything from said property! The American Experinent, is not even visible. Democracy is only assured if you dont live on private roads, pursuit of happiness only extends to how much one can tolerate the widespread thievery,substance abuse, alcoholism, discontent for those not willing to stoop to substandard scruples, and the them inability & unwillingness for government to assure adequate police coverage. Patrolling and preventing crime was something back in America, one officer informed me! When time-tested methods to prevent crime & keep law and order are not considered, those that are more likely to commit crimes, harass, and snub their noses at law enforcement, have no reprisals to be concerned about, which is causing many that wish a better community to leave the island to return to their respective origins. Many may be okay with such a scenario, but keep in mind, the likelihood of those that move off island to discourage potential investors, vacationers, tourists, and emigres to think twice before considering bringing their families & money here to spend and possibly buy land, and contribute to the local economy. In closing, I hope someone someday will consider this idea of keeping people down will also cause people to keep (at least parts of)
Hawaii Island as difficult to survive as possible!!!
I’m pleasantly surprised that she posed the question. Not surprised of the answer. I used to think with all of the history & laws coming to light, how can Americans just keep going on here & never quite give the issue of the illegal occupation of our peaceful Hawaiian Kingdom any serious consideration? Now, Jen is giving it serious consideration. There’s hope yet. Its a historic moment, just to have asked, on the public record, and then, to demand a clear answer.
And it’s usually the same kind of answer: deny deny deny.
I am Hawaiian, and I’m glad I voted for Jen Ruggles. I don’t think you have to be in the sovereignty movement to care about basic human rights, the truth, the facts & the law. You just have to value human rights for all, that’s global.
Tourists from countries around the world tell us Hawaiians, privately, of course, that they heard about our case & support the right to our own government. The Australians, Europeans, S.Americans, they know, they tell us, it’s wrong to have to live under a military occupation.
Mahalo nui loa Ms.Ruggles. You are the 2nd American haole wahine in an official US capacity to forward the issue to the UN for further consideration, the first was that Judge, Sandra Schutte(? I think) who sent the Larsen case to the International court (that I can remember).
We would urge all Hawai’i legislators and administrators at county, state and federal levels to ask this question of their government level counsel to advise if they are committing war crimes by drafting legislation under U.S. or Hawai’i laws and then enacting them into laws imposed on Hawai’i residents. Do this to protect your rights and to determine if you are violating your oath of office.
You are involved in a long term illegal occupation of Hawai’i by the United States of America.
Continuing to legislate, now that you know of the illegal occupation, makes you liable to be charged with war crimes.
History has provided many examples of what happens to those that knowingly commit war crimes.
Jen Ruggles has shown the courage to act on her conscious and with the life experience to do what is right.
I’m all good with her thoughts and actions, my question is; Is esteemed council member being paid to not legislate? And by whom?
Forward and spread far and wide….time to break the shackles! Imua!
What if….
Everyone were to take advantage of this platform, help give jen ruggles her answer, and do an administrative process to confirm that neither the County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, nor US, inc. has any jurisdiction in Hawaii Kin-dom???
Procedure and timing is very important. The strategy: Everyone, individually, will all mail (using actual stamps, NOT metered, with certificate of mailing ($1.40 as proof)- to stay in the private, put your address in the form c/o 123 tree street, hilo, hawaii, non-domestic, zip exempt, without the U.S.) our jurated/notarized affidavits (along with the UN letter, Clinton Apology Bill, etc… ) to all public servants from top down, individually….some addresses below for your convenience. Attached is an affidavit template…use your own words, but it’s important to include the stuff that’s bold. Give 20-30 days for reply. Make copies of everything for your records.
With their silence, we mail ‘Notice of Fault with Opportunity to Cure’…give 10 days for reply.
With their silence, we mail ‘Notice of Default and Consent to Judgement’ …give 3 days for reply.
With their silence, we will all file claims with the county and state risk management
Record all into the public records
Risk Management:
state claim for injury/harm:
https://ags.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/RMTC-001-20160909.pdf
county claim for injury/harm:
http://records.co.hawaii.hi.us/WebLink/1/edoc/24873/Claim%20for%20Damage%20or%20Injury%20-%20Fillable%20Form.pdf
1)Mitch Roth, acting Prosecuting Attorney
Holomua Center, 64-1067 Mamalahoa Highway, Kamuela, HI 96743
(808) 887-3017 | Fax (808) 887-3016, hilopros@co.hawaii.hi.us
2)Russell Suzuki, acting Attorney General
Department of the Attorney General
425 Queen Street
Honolulu, HI 96813 (Map)
Telephone: (808) 586-1500 Fax: (808) 586-1239
3. mark recktenwald, acting chief justice: chiefjustice@courts.hawaii.gov, f (808) 539-4703
Supreme Court
Ali`iolani Hale
417 South King Street
Honolulu, Hawai`i 96813-2943
4.greg nakamura, acting chief judge: 808-961-7464, f(808) 539-4644, clerk says can’t give greg’s email but send to her: lisa.m.viernes@courts.hawaii.gov
Third Circuit Court – Hilo
Hale Kaulike
777 Kilauea Avenue
Hilo, HI 96720
5. Nolan espinda, director of dept. of public safety: (808) 587-1288, Fax: (808) 587-1282, E-mail: psd.office.of.the.director@hawaii.gov , renee.r.sonobehong@hawaii.gov
Mail: 919 Ala Moana Boulevard, 4th Floor
Honolulu, HI 96814
6. peter cabreros, acting warden: Fax: (808) 933-0425 , Phone: (808) 933-0431, peter.s.cabreros@hawaii.gov
60 Punahele Street
Hilo, HI 96720
Phone: (808) 933-0431
Fax: (808) 933-0425
7. http://www.hawaiipolice.com/contact-us/police-department-contacts
acting Police Chief, Paul Ferreira: (808) 961-2244 (f)961-2389, hcpdone@hawaiicounty.gov
Hawaiʻi Police Department
349 Kapiʻolani Street
Hilo, Hawaiʻi 96720
8. Lester Oshiro, acting chief clerk
Lester.D.Oshiro@courts.hawaii.gov, Phone: 961-7440, FAX: 961-7598
(808) 961-7435
Third Circuit Chief Court Administrator
Hale Kaulike
777 Kilauea Avenue
Hilo, Hawai`i 96720-4212
9. Harry Kim, acting mayor
Fax: (808) 323-4440, Tel: (808) 323-4444, fax: 961-6553, harry.kim@hawaiicounty.gov
https://hawaiicounty.wufoo.com/forms/x1u08sen1o8l1o3/
Hilo: Hawai‘i County Building
25 Aupuni St., Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720
Tel: (808) 961-8211
Fax: (808) 961-6553
10. David Y. Ige, acting governor
Phone: (808) 586-0034, Fax: (808) 586-0006, no email
https://governor.hawaii.gov/contact-us/general-contact-information/
Governor, State of Hawaii
Executive Chambers
State Capitol
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Phone: (808) 586-0034
Fax: (808) 586-0006
11. Douglas Chin, acting Lieutenant Governor
State Capitol
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Phone: (808) 586-0255, Fax: (808) 586-0231, shan.tsutsui@hawaii.gov
Website: http://ltgov.hawaii.gov
http://ltgov.hawaii.gov/contact/contact-the-lieutenant-governor/
12. Joseph K. Kamelamela, acting County of Hawaii corporation counsel
Hilo Lagoon Centre, 101 Aupuni Street, Unit 325, Hilo, HI 96720
(808) 961-8251 | Fax: (808) 961-8622
Email: corpcounsel@hawaiicounty.gov
13. acting county council:
Hilo: 25 Aupuni Street, Suite 1402/2402, Hilo, HI 96720
Phone: (808) 961-8255 | Fax: (808) 961-8912
valerie.poindexter@hawaiicounty.gov
aaron.chung@hawaiicounty.gov
sue.leeloy@hawaiicounty.gov
eileen.ohara@hawaiicounty.gov
jen.ruggles@hawaiicounty.gov
maile.david@hawaiicounty.gov
dru.kanuha@hawaiicounty.gov
karen.eoff@hawaiicounty.gov
tim.richards@hawaiicounty.gov
14. Deanna S. Sako, Director of Finance
Stan Sitko, Real Property Tax Administrator
101 Pauahi St., Ste. #4
Hilo, Hawaii [96720]
==
Living Testimony in Affidavit form, under affirmation of penalty of perjury (verified)
i, a private living wo/man, :smith : john, the undersigned, one of the people, make this Testimony/Declaration of Truth of my own free will, and i hereby affirm, declare that i am of lawful age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the information contained in this Testimony/Declaration is factual, correct and not misleading to the best of my knowledge. i claim that i am not a person/fiction/corporation/voter/taxpayer/officer/agent/shareholder/franchisee/resident/vessel/citizen created under the laws of the United States or any state, the District of Columbia, or any territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States or any foreign state or country public or private, domestic nor foreign, ab initio. i am not an enemy of the United States or any corporation created under the laws of the United States or any state, the District of Columbia, or any territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States, or a foreign state or country public or private. Any presumption that i am any of the above or documentation implying any of the above, is fraudulent, illusionary, false representation of a matter of fact or a kind of artifice employed to deceive.
This Testimony/Declaration of Truth is lawful notification to all public servants including but not limited to, Joseph K. Kamelamela, acting corporation counsel; Valerie Pointdexter, Aaron Chung, Sue Leeloy, Eileen Ohara, Jen Ruggles, Maile David, Dru Kanuha, Karen Eoff, Tim Richards, acting counsel members; Mitch Roth, acting prosecutor; Russell Suzuki, acting attorney general; Nolan Espinda, acting director of Dept. of Public Safety; Peter Cabreros, acting warden (HCCC), Lester Oshiro, acting chief clerk/administrator; Paul Ferreira, acting police chief; David Ige, acting governor; Harry Kim, acting mayor; Deanna S. Sako, acting Director of Finance; Stan Sitko, Real Property Tax Administrator, Mark Recktenwald, acting Chief Justice; Greg Nakamura, acting Chief Judge, and is hereby created and mailed to you via the united States post office, pursuant to the Federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X, and the Declaration of Rights of the Hawaii State Constitution, in particular, Article 1, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 18, and 20, also pursuant to your oaths of office and bonds. Whoever, being a public official, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, and made available for public inspection in accordance with section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (22 USCS §616]. i require your written rebuttal to me, specific to each and every point of the subject matter stated herein, within 20 days, via your own sworn and notarized affidavit, using fact, law and evidence to support your rebuttal of the specific subject matter stated in this Affidavit/Declaration. You are hereby noticed that your failure to respond, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity and specificity, anything with which you disagree in this Affidavit/Declaration, is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything attested to in this Affidavit/Declaration is true, factual, correct, legal, lawful, and fully binding upon you in any court in America and/or international courts of justice, without your protest or objection, or that of those who represent you. Your silence is your acquiescence. [Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391]. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.” [U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297.] “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” You swore an oath to uphold and support the Constitution for the united States of America and the Constitution of Hawaii, and pursuant to your oaths, you are required to abide by that oath in the performance of your official duties as public servants. You have no Constitutional or other valid authority to defy the Constitutions, to which you owe your LIMITED authority, delegated to you by and through the People, and to which you swore your oaths. By your unlawful actions, specifically enumerated and described below, you acted in sedition and insurrection against the Constitutions, both federal and state, violated treaty laws (supreme law of the land) and committed treason against the People.
Notice to principal is notice to agent, notice to agent is notice to principal.
The following are statements of fact rebuttable only by verified affidavit:
1- A Scottish corporation calling itself “The United States of America, Inc.” and a Delaware corporation calling itself the “United States of America, Inc.” have been usurping the American Government masquerading as a constitutional republic since ~1868.
http://annavonreitz.com/howyouweredefrauded.pdf
2- To incorporate is to agree to submit to some other corporation or entity. A corporation is limited to powers and authorities of the entity under which it is incorporated. Corporations and their agents only have jurisdiction over other corporations, not over living people.
-28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
-The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia. “Corp. U.S.”
http://annavonreitz.com/public-order-blank-1.pdf
3- The Data Universal Numbering System is a business identification database where corporations are registered, including US corporate government and its major agencies.
-https://scannedretina.com/2015/07/11/us-corp-national-franchise-state-and-city-branches-duns-numbers/
-https://scannedretina.com/2015/07/11/us-corp-and-some-agencies-db-numbers-used-to-impersonate-the-lawful-government-of-the-american-people/
https://dandb.com/search/?country=US&keyword=county+of+hawaii&state=HI&type=cos&submit=Search+Now
4- All three levels of the United States “Federal Government” have been rendered incompetent. The actual Federal Government is still dormant pending completion of its “reconstruction”. Both the Territorial and Municipal Government have gone bankrupt.
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20page%201.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20Mail%20Receipt%20.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20Proof%20of%20Mailing.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/briefreportenglish.pdf
5- The “Agencies”, including the elected Governor, are NOT ‘Public officials’ responsible to the people. They are not organized under the Executive Branch.’ Rodney–Dale; Class v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 11 CV 1559, 2011
http://image.rayservers.com/rodney-dale-class-vs-UNITED-STATES/traffic_filing/_3.15.11%20Rod%20Filing%20Traffic%20Case%20NC.pdf
http://www.amendment-13.org/
6- Oaths of office relinquishes US citizenship; thus, oath takers are acting as foreign agents and are required to file with the Attorney General.
People v. Vaughn, 196 Cal.App.2d 622, 16 Cal. Rptr. 711. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 911 et seq
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1481
(a) A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality—
(2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/612
No person shall act as an agent of a foreign principal unless he has filed with the Attorney General a true and complete registration statement and supplements.
7- The United States Supreme Court functions actually as a “business”. CRIS (Court Registry Investment System) account is what connects a false judicial system to the bank; it is the mechanism through which they access funds that were created in people’s names without their knowledge.
https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-itnj/cris-court-registry-investment-system/
8- County, state, and federal governments keep a hidden, second set of books, CAFR, to defraud and steal from people: http://cafr1.com
9- The unincorporated Hawaiian government was illegally and unlawfully occupied by the private corporation, United States, through force.
UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAW 103-150, 103d Congress Joint Resolution 19, Nov. 23, 1993
“Whereas, the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, The Congress
(3) apologizes to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the people of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii on January 17, 1893 with the participation of agents and citizens of the United States, and the deprivation of the rights of Native Hawaiians to self-determination;
(4) expresses its commitment to acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, in order to provide a proper foundation for reconciliation between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people; and
(5) urges the President of the United States to also acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii and to support reconciliation efforts between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people.
10- No Treay of Annexation exists.
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/treatyprot.html
Official Protest to the Treaty of Annexation, Presented by Lili`uokalani in Washington D.C., June 17, 1897
11- Treaties are the supreme law of the land, Article VI of the Constitution
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi
“…and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
-http://www.hawaii-nation.org/treaty1849.html
12- The Motu Proprio issued by the Pope on July 11th, 2013, (Roman Curia being the highest legal instrument of all corporations world wide) decree that all corporations and their agents have no immunity.
-http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20130711_organi-giudiziari.html
-https://www.gold-shield-alliance.com/papal_decree
13- The bankrupt, incompetent, private corporations, “The United States of America, Inc.”, “United States, Inc.”, “UNITED STATES, INC”, “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC”, and all subsidiaries, all sub corporations and all “State” franchises, have no jurisdiction within the Hawaiian Islands, an independent sovereign nation. These corporations are engaging in war crimes without immunity since 1893.
Lawful notification has been provided. If you do not timely rebut the statements, declarations, charges and averments made in this Testimony/Affidavit/Declaration, then you agree with and admit to them. Pursuant to this lawful notification, if you disagree with anything stated in this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth, you are required to rebut that with which you disagree, with particularity, within thirty (30) days of receipt thereof, by means of your written, notarized affidavit of truth, based upon specific, relevant fact and valid, Constitutionally compliant law, specific to the Bill of Rights, to support your disagreement. Along with your rebuting Affidavit, you are required to provide a certified copy of your Oath of Office; public hazard bond information including contact, badge # if applicable; Foreign Agent Registration, evidence that HRS/public policies/codes and the corresponding enacting clauses that lawfully support them, are not repugnant to the Constitution specific to the Bill of Rights, not in violation to Treaties, and that they apply to private living people. I reserve my unlimited, unalienable right not to be compelled to perform to the terms of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement that i did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. Furthermore, i do not accept nor consent to the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this Testimony/Affidavit/Declaration of Truth is true, correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable admission attesting to this, fully binding upon you in any court of law in America as well as internationa courts of law, without your protest, objection, applicable also to those who represent you.
Affiant/Aggrieved/Claimant further sayeth naught.
By:_______________________, L.S.
All Rights Reserved, without prejudice, UCC 1- 308
c/o 123 kamehameha street
hilo, hawaii, zip exempt, non-domestic, without the U.S.
JURAT
Hawaii }
} SA.
Subscribed and affirmed by :smith :john proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence before me, this ____ day of __________, 2018.
Autograph: _______________________________ Notary
My Commission Expires:_____________ (SEAL)
Address: _____________________________
_____________________________
==
NOTICE OF FAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE, AGREEMENT AND DISHONOR
THIS IS A SELF-EXECUTING CONTRACT
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal
Re: Living Testimony in Affidavit form, war crimes
To Respondents:
1. Joseph K. Kamelamela, acting corporation counsel;
2. Valerie Pointdexter, Aaron Chung, Sue Leeloy, Eileen Ohara, Jen Ruggles, Maile
David, Dru Kanuha, Karen Eoff, Tim Richards, acting counsel members;
3. Mitch Roth, acting prosecutor;
4. Russell Suzuki, acting attorney general;
5. Nolan Espinda, acting director of Dept. of Public Safety;
6. Peter Cabreros, acting warden (HCCC),
7. Lester Oshiro, acting chief clerk/administrator;
8. Paul Ferreira, acting police chief;
9. David Ige, acting governor;
10. Harry Kim, acting mayor;
11. Deanna S. Sako, acting Director of Finance;
12. Stan Sitko, Real Property Tax Administrator
13. Mark Recktenwald, acting Chief Justice
14. Greg Nakamura, acting Chief Judge
NOTICE OF FAULT
This action is presented to the people listed above and require them to answer personally, point-by-point, by verified affidavits affirmed under jurat, under penalties of perjury.
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTICED that you are in fault of an opportunity to respond and rebut the verified Living Testimony in Affidavit form, via administrative action under [Public Law 97-280] and scripture, sent to you on or by Date Mailed by united Stated Post Office, with certificate of mailing. Due to Respondents’ failure to answer with a specific, verified, and sworn point by point response to Claimant’s Living Testimony, a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT is being sought against Respondents, having waived the right to answer, by tacit admission and failure to contest, rejecting Respondents’ due process opportunity.
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
In case there was an oversight, mistake, or otherwise unintentional, Claimant grant Respondents ten (10) days from the date of postmark, to cure the fault and effect the remedy. Failure to cure will constitute, as an operation of law, the FINAL admission and agreement of the liability of Respondents through tacit procuration shall be deemed stare decisis.
I, :smith: john, herein “Claimant” do herewith affirm and declare under my unlimited commercial liability that i am competent and of lawful age to state the matters set forth herein, that they are true, correct, complete, and not intended to be misleading, they are admissible as evidence, and in accordance with my best firsthand knowledge, comprehension and belief.
All rights reserved without prejudice.
Dated the ___ day of ___________ in the year Two Thousand and _________________.
[day] [month] [year – written]
By:________________________, L.S.
:smith: john, without prejudice, UCC 1-308
By:___________________ c/o____________________________
Witness #1 [print] Address
By:___________________ c/o____________________________ #2 [print] Address
==
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE, AGREEMENT AND DISHONOR
THIS IS A SELF-EXECUTING CONTRACT
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal
Re: Living Testimony in Affidavit form, war crimes
To Respondents:
1. Joseph K. Kamelamela, acting corporation counsel;
2. Valerie Pointdexter, Aaron Chung, Sue Leeloy, Eileen Ohara, Jen Ruggles, Maile
David, Dru Kanuha, Karen Eoff, Tim Richards, acting counsel members;
3. Mitch Roth, acting prosecutor;
4. Russell Suzuki, acting attorney general;
5. Nolan Espinda, acting director of Dept. of Public Safety;
6. Peter Cabreros, acting warden (HCCC),
7. Lester Oshiro, acting chief clerk/administrator;
8. Paul Ferreira, acting police chief;
9. David Ige, acting governor;
10. Harry Kim, acting mayor;
11. Deanna S. Sako, acting Director of Finance;
12. Stan Sitko, Real Property Tax Administrator
13. Mark Recktenwald, acting Chief Justice
14. Greg Nakamura, acting Chief Judge
NOTICE OF DEFAULT
This action is presented to the people listed above and require them to answer personally, point-by-point, by verified affidavits affirmed under jurat, under penalties of perjury.
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTICED that you are in default of an opportunity to respond and rebut the verified Living Testimony in Affidavit form, via administrative action under [Public Law 97-280] and scripture, sent to you on or by Date Mailed by united Stated Post Office, with certificate of mailing. Due to Respondents’ failure to answer with a specific, verified, and sworn point by point response to Claimant’s Living Testimony and Notice of Fault, a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT is issued against Respondents, having waived the right to answer, by tacit admission and failure to contest, rejecting Respondents’ due process opportunity. The administrative process has been exhausted.
I, :smith: john, herein “Claimant” do herewith affirm and declare under my unlimited commercial liability that i am competent and of lawful age to state the matters set forth herein, that they are true, correct, complete, and not intended to be misleading, they are admissible as evidence, and in accordance with my best firsthand knowledge, comprehension and belief.
All rights reserved without prejudice.
Dated the ___ day of ___________ in the year Two Thousand and _________________.
[day] [month] [year – written]
By:________________________, L.S.
:smith: john, without prejudice, UCC 1-308
By:___________________ c/o____________________________
Witness #1 [print] Address
By:___________________ c/o____________________________ #2 [print] Address
==
BASICS
“A mind once stretched can never go back to its original dimensions.”
Whoever makes a claim, must provide proof/evidence. No disrepect, but…i only claim to be wo/man on the land….is anything else relevant?
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” R. Buckminster Fuller
Milligan Ex Parte, 1866
The Court clearly stated that when civilian courts resumed operations in the military districts, the quasi-military tribunals were to shut down.
http://www.paulstramer.net/
The “Natural Law” is that we are all here NOW, and we are the current proprietors— all of us, black, white, brown, copper, yellow, pink—- and it doesn’t matter where our ancestors came from or how long ago they arrived on these shores. All these “indigenous claims” are just more excuses for one group of people to claim a hammer over other groups of people…We are ALL “indigenous” to this soil who were born here. Our Mothers all took up the nutrients and atoms to form our bodies from this same soil. How dare anyone pretend otherwise? So we are all “indigenous” to this soil [] and we are all alive right now, having an equal standing and claim to be part of it all. Stop all this whining about what went on in the past. The past is past. Get your heads screwed on tight and make ready for the future which you all get a chance to help decide.
They do not want you asking questions.
They do not want you thinking for yourself.
They do not want you UNITED.
They want you to live in FEAR/DIVIDED.
They want you asleep.
They want you blind.
The Fraud: http://www.yourstrawman.com/Strawman.pdf, http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/MeetYourStrawMan.pdf
https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2018/08/04/why-every-non-federal-american-needs-to-declare-their-actual-political-status/ substitute hawaiian for american…really, it’s just a word.
“if you…are not a “federal” employee or dependent, you need to come home to the land and soil jurisdiction you are heir to….For your safety and the safety of your family, you must take action to reclaim your “Natural Person” status and re-convey your “title” to your “land assets” as instructed in Article 928 on my website: www.annavonreitz.com.”
https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2018/08/03/the-logic-of-the-situation-again-for-all-those-not-quite-understanding/
“You have to get the record of your actual political status established in order to claim back your property out of the bankruptcy slush pile and enforce the guarantees you are owed….
You have to assemble with other eligible [Hawaiian] nationals to reboot your local County (not “County of”) and State (not “State of”) and prepare to operate your actual sovereign government and take care of business….Both these things have to be addressed and done in order for you and your children to inherit back what is rightfully yours.”
Hawaii REPUBLIC/Hawaii KINdom– Jural Assembly Build it….they will come
Words are used to control and manipulate…use them wisely and go back to the basics.
Although common/natural law is the law of the land, the republic is not currently available because there’s no dejure govt (in Hawaii nor America–for those who keep saying there is, please provide proof), nor any lawful money ( FRN’s are debt instruments), etc… Why are free and independent people still using federally controlled licenses, permits, registration, bank accounts, SS#, etc…?
How to build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete?
1- Correct our status as living wo/men
2- Organize the jural assemblies (for each island)
3- Create PRIVATE independent banks, currency, post office, stamps, military, id’s, passports, etc…Panterra’s done it! Molassia has great ideas. Keep it simple. Be creative! (molossia.org, panterrapca.org)
Must listen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wriHD0IRxe4 Ken Cousens Explains the Why and How of Building a Private Society – Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFVteB9sJL8 Ken Cousens Explains the Why and How of Building a Private Society – Part 2 – history
https://www.gemstoneuniversity.org/
https://www.panterrapca.org/ Lots of good templates here
“one key ANSWER is to know how to properly remove oneself from the field of battle yet still be able to function creatively and abundantly, to have the life you wish and to contribute to building a better world.”
https://www.melchizedek.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50gpTHjLV8Q International Laws Control the World: Prime Minister David Wiliams
46:45 treaty law binds the nations….treaty power can undo any nation’s regulations.
52: if people don’t learn to self-govern….same enslavement under any govt.
https://deprogrammingseries.com/
http://sovereignwarriors2.
Just an example: No attorneys/Lawyers/Esquires are allowed in an ASSEMBLY COURT. What this means is that concerning TRAFFIC TICKETS (or any issue involving courts), the judge of the Assembly Court would issue an order to the SCRIBE (I.e.Clerk at the DE FACTO COURT) to be sent to the DE FACTO COURT, to remove this case (within 30 days with the ‘Notice of Removal’) and thus bring it to the dejure Assembly Court. Unless there has actually been a CORPUS DELECTI and INJURED PARTY/PROPERTY, then all that is happening is what is called “VICTIMLESS CRIMES”, which means there is NO CRIME. It works off STATUTES, which is semblance of the law, not the actual Law.
[Once Hawaii is] operating back Lawfully and in the PRIVATE, opposed to the PUBLIC, you can take back the [Hawaiian Nation] to the Lawful [dejure] way it was intended.
Get yourself a Newspaper created. Make sure you have a REPORTER as one of the OFFICES…. by completing all the steps necessary, you post for 3 weeks in a row, this then is the NOTICE just like the DE FACTO GOVERNMENT does, which is the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, this satisfies the requirement of proper NOTICE issued. A scribe is needed to take MINUTES of the meetings.
==
STATUS CORRECTION
https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2018/08/07/a-big-mistake/
I wish it could be just a matter of joining a Jural Assembly, but it isn’t….The way they have you classified, it’s improper for you to participate in a Jural Assembly until you correct your political status….you can’t be a living man who is part of a living assembly of free men and at the same time “be” a corporate franchise. It’s not possible.
Once you re-establish your status as a living man or woman, you can move any corporations named after you back to a permanent domicile on the land and soil jurisdiction and operate them in international trade instead of international commerce. This is the difference between owning and operating a boat and being a boat.
In order to be part of a Jural Assembly of living people you have to claim the life and lineage you are part of and claim the reversionary trust interest in your natural estate ”
https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2018/08/08/example-of-my-claim-for-the-life-lineage-treaty/
https://mainerepublicemailreport.files.wordpress.com/2018/08/claim-of-the-life.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/basicforms.pdf
https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2018/08/09/passports/
ENFORCEMENT:
There are plenty of enforcements on the private side (hague, upu, court of claims, etc…) through treaty (article 6 says treaty is supreme law of the land)…international law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi
“…and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/treaty1826.html
https://www.hawaii-nation.org/treaty1875.html
https://evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10524/345/2/JL17048.pdf
https://www.alohaquest.com/archive/treaty_annexation_1897.htm was this the defacto treaty?
https://history.state.gov/countries/hawaii
We MUST stay in the PRIVATE from the very 1st interaction, in order to obtain protection and enforcement (i would love to witness the provost marshal come in to take someone out from jail, wouldn’t you?). If not, we’ll have to fight in the PUBLIC (their house, their jurisdiction) and it won’t be easy. We must comprehend that we canNOT argue jurisdiction when we’ve already stepped into their house by contract, due to our own ignorance. It’s counterintuitive to hear there are NO courts….everything in the world is commerce and administrative.
TREATY
The United States Constitution, Article VI says that Treaties are the Supreme Law of the Land. The BEST TREATY document is the Articles of Confederation comprising of 4 organic laws:
1. God’s Unwritten Law (Nature)
2. Maxims of Law (10 Commandments)
3. Common Law
4. Treaty Law
U.S. Congress declared the Bible, “The Word of God” under Public Law 97-280, 9r h Congress, 96 Stat. 1211. WHEN WE ACT DEJURE there is ENFORCEMENT under the Expatriation Act.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08iGjlvJoUQ U.S. Citizens Have No Rights with Prime Minister David Williams
3:33 Article VI: treaty law is supreme law of the land
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/
Art: 3rd
The contracting parties being desirous to avail themselves of the bounties of Divine Providence, by promoting the commercial intercourse and friendship subsisting between the respective Nations, for the better security of these desirable objects, Their Majesties bind themselves to receive into their Ports and Harbours all ships and vessels of the United States; and to protect, to the utmost of their capacity, all such ships and vessels, their cargoes officers and crews, so long as they shall behave themselves peacefully, and not infringe the established laws of the land, the citizens of the United States being permitted to trade freely with the people of the Sandwich Islands.
Art: 6th
Citizens of the United States, whether resident or transient, engaged in commerce, or trading to the Sandwich Islands, shall be inviolably protected in their lawful pursuits; and shall be allowed to sue for, and recover by judgment, all claims against the subjects of His Majesty The King,according to strict principles of equity, and the acknowledged practice of civilized nations.
Art: 7th
Their Majesties do further agree and bind themselves to discountenance and use all practicable means to prevent desertion from all American ships which visit the Sandwich Islands; and to that end it shall be made the duty of all Governors, Magistrates, Chiefs of Districts, and all others in authority, to apprehend all deserters; and to deliver them over to the master of the vessel from which they have deserted; and for the apprehension of every such deserter, who shall be delivered over as aforesaid, the master, owner, or agent, shall pay to the person or persons apprehending such deserter, the sum of six Dollars, if taken on the side of the Island near which the vessel is anchored; but if taken on the opposite side of the Island, the sum shall be twelve Dollars; and if taken on any other Island, the reward shall be twenty four Dollars, and shall be a just charge against the wages of every such deserter.
https://www.hawaii-nation.org/
King Kalaukaua in his speech before the opening session of the 1887 Hawaiian Legislature stated:
“…whereby it is agreed and understood that it does not cede any territory or part with or impair any right of sovereignty or jurisdiction on the part of the Hawaiian Kingdom and that such privilege is coterminous with the treaty. I regard this as one of the most important events of my reign, and I sincerely believe that it will re-establish the commercial progress and prosperity which began with the Reciprocity Treaty.”
On October 19, 1887, I had the honor to state to H.B.M.’s Commissioner, in dispatch to him on this subject that ” all rights, the sovereignty and independence of this Kingdom are to be conserved, such a privilege could not have been conceded to any other power, the status of other nations possessing treaties with Hawaii is unchanged by the preferential character of the article, and in on other respect has any preference been given which has not hither to been enjoyed by the United States.”
https://www.hawaii-nation.org/
Article I
There shall be perpetual peace and amity between the United States and the King of the Hawaiian Islands, hisheirs and his successors.
Article II
There shall be reciprocal liberty of commerce and navigation between the United States of America and the Hawaiian Islands.
Article VI
Steam vessel of the United States which may be employed by the Government of the said States, in the carrying of their Public Mail across the Pacific Ocean
Article VII
The Whale ships of the United States shall have access to the Port of Hilo, Kealakekua and Hanalei in the Sandwich Islands, for the purposes of refitment and refreshment, as well as to the ports of Honolulu and Lahaina which only are ports of entry for all Merchant vessels…They shall so be permitted to pass from port to port of the Sandwich Islands for the purpose of procuring refreshments, but they shall not discharge their seamen or land their passenger in the said Islands, except at Lahaina and Honolulu;
Article VIII
The contracting parties engage, in regard to the personal privileges, that the citizens of the United States of America shall enjoy in the dominion of His Majesty the King of the Hawaiian Islands, and the subjects of his said Majesty in the United States of America, that they shall have free and undoubted right to travel and to reside in the states of the two high contracting parties….
And if a question should a arise among several claimants as to which of them aid goods belong, the same shall be decided finally by the laws and judges of the land….The citizens or subjects of the contracting parties shall not be obligated to pay, under any pretence whatever, any taxes or impositions other or greater than those which are paid, or may hereafter be paid , by the subjects or citizens of most favored nations, in the respective states of the high contracting parties. They shall be exempt from all military service, whether by land or by sea; from forced loans; and from every extraordinary contribution not general and by law established. Their dwellings, warehouses, and all premises appertaining thereto, destined for the purposes of commerce or residence shall be respected. ….
Article IX
The citizen and subjects of each of the two contracting parties shall be free in the state of the other to manage their own affairs themselves, or to commit those affairs to the management of any persons whom they may appoint as their broker, factor or agent; nor shall the citizens and subjects of the two contracting parties be restrained in their choice of person to act in such capacities, nor shall they be called upon to pay and salary or remuneration to any person whom they shall not choose to employ. …Absolute freedom shall be given in all cases to the buyer and seller to bargain together and to fix the price of any good or merchandise imported into, or to be exported…But nothing contained in this or any other article of the present Treaty shall be construed to authorize the sale of spirituous liquors to the natives of the Sandwich Islands, further than such sale may be allowed by the Hawaiian laws.
Article X
Each of the two contracting parties may have, in the ports of the other, consul, vice consul, and commercial agent, of their own appointment, who shall enjoy the same privileges and power with those of the most favored nations; but if any such consul shall exercise commerce,they shall be subject to the same law and usage to which the private individuals of their nation are subject in the same place. The said Consul, vice consul, and commercial agents are authorized to require the assistance of the local authorities for the search, arrest, detention, and imprisonment of the deserters from the ships of war and merchant vessels of their country….For this purpose, they shall apply to the competent tribunal, judges and officers, and shall in writing demand the said deserters, proving, by the exhibition of the registers of the vessel, the rolls of the crews, or by other official document, that such individual formed part of the crew; and this reclamation being thus substantiated, the offender shall not be refused. Such deserters, when arrested shall be placed at the disposal of the said consul, vice consul, or commercial agents, and may be confined in the public prison, at the request and cost of those who all claim them, in order to be detained until the time when they shall be restored to the vessel to which they belonged, or sent back to their own country by a vessel of the same nation or any other vessel whatsoever. ….
Article XIV
The contracting parties mutually agree to surrender,upon official requisition, to the authority of each, all persons who, being charged with the crimes of murder, piracy,arson, robbery, forgery or the utterance of forged paper,committed within the jurisdiction of either, shall be found within the territories of the other; provided, that this shall only be done upon such evidence or criminality as, according to the laws of the place where the person so charged shall be found, would justify his apprehension and commitment for trial if the crime had there been committed: and the respective judges and other magistrates of the two Governments, shall have authority, upon complaint made under oath, to issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person do charged, that he may be brought before such judge or other magistrates respectively, to the end that the evidence of criminality may be heard and considered;and if, on such hearing, the evidence be deemed sufficient to sustain the charge, it shall be the duty of the examining judge or magistrate to certify the same to the proper executive authority, that a warrant may issued for the surrender of such fugitive. The expense of such apprehension and delivery shall be borne and defrayed by the party who makes the requisition and receives the fugitive.
Article XV
It shall be optional to prepay the postage on letters in either country, but postage on printed sheets and newspapers shall in all cases be prepaid.
Article XV
Any citizen or subject of either party infringing the articles of this treaty shall be held responsible for the same and the harmony and good correspondence between the two governments shall not be interrupted thereby, each party engaging in no way to protect the offender or sanction such violation.
https://www.itnj.org/it nj/itnj-treaty/
“I, a man/woman, hereby mandate the International Tribunal for Natural Justice by my ratification of this, the Treaty of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice, voluntarily, freely, and absent any outside influence, coercion, or duress, having attained the age of majority and being in full control of my mental and physical faculties.
Having awakened to the truth that since the moment of our birth We have been contracted to corporate institutions which by their very nature serve neither people nor planet, and in hereby revoking in earnest all such contracts which have blinded, encumbered, and sought to separate us from our most noble expression, We now claim a rightful place in this world which the Supreme Creator within has provided for us all, as equals amongst all, and will take such action as to ensure the restoration of truth and justice for all people of the world.
We have met with such a truth, as We have come to know it, understand it, and embrace it, and now choose to be ruled by it for the rest of our days.
We, according to the solemn duty as aforesaid, and per the dictate of conscience, ratify the present treaty with the earnest intention that truth and reason be restored to the delivery of justice in the world.
And so, recognising that in Truth:
i. Law in its purest form requires nothing more or less than that we each do no harm.
ii. Harm in any form is only ever caused by natural persons, regardless of whether or not the natural person may claim to be operating under corporate dictate, colour of law, or otherwise.
iii. Harm in any form is only ever capable of being suffered by natural persons, regardless of whether or not the harm suffered may have been so suffered through a natural person’s artificial externalities.
iv. Neither corporate immunity, nor colour of right, can indemnify a natural person for harm caused to another.
v. No natural person is bound by the unlawful ruling of a de facto court where they are not a consenting party with full knowledge of the manner in which their consent is given.
We the natural men and women of the world, pursuant to the ultimate goal of realising equal rights and dignity for each member of the human family,
HEREBY MANDATE the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.
The Tribunal shall exist and function according to Constitution of the International Tribunal for Natural Justice as included by reference herein.
Let this message go forth from this time and place to all the peoples of the world that to right the wrongs done to them and in vindication of their rights and the enforcement of just causes and to hold accountable those responsible for breaches of human rights it is proclaimed that the International Tribunal for Natural Justice is hereby established pursuant to this Treaty and Constitution.
MAIL
https://pe.usps.com/text/Imm/
742 Stamps Not Affixed
742.1 Marking
Some items of foreign origin do not bear postage stamps, but instead are marked “POSTAGE PAID,” “ON POSTAL SERVICE,” “SERVICE DES POSTES,” “TAXE PERCUE” or “TP,” or “PORT PAYE” or “PP,” followed by postmark. The marking On Her Majesty’s Service or O.H.M.S. is also sometimes used. Treat this mail as prepaid.
742.2 Parcels Without Postage Stamps
Some foreign post offices do not put postage stamps on parcels. All such parcels received must be regarded as prepaid.
House Joint Resolution HJR 192/ Public Law 73-10
18 USC § 1701 – Obstruction of mails generally
Whoever knowingly and willfully obstructs or retards the passage of the mail, or any carrier or conveyance carrying the mail, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
http://www.law.corneII.edu/
Section 1701-Obstruction of mails generally is cited in: U.S.C TITLE 18-CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE U.S.C TITLE 39-POSTAL SERVICE
http://www.webmavin.com/2015/10/11/postal-power/
The UPU operates under the authority of treaties with every country in the world…Involving the authority of the UPU is automatically invoked by the use of postage stamps…Using a postage stamp and autograph on it makes you the postmaster for that Contract. Whenever you put a stamp on a document, inscribe your full name over the stamp at an angle…purple (royalty), blue (origin of the bond), and gold (king’s edict)…
don’t want to use Post Office Boxes or home addresses to do taxe percue. They will try to hold your mail and play games…simply contact the postmaster general and give them the mail codes, and ask to get the general delivery mail location address…a sovereign doesnt use mail.nbers, door knockers, door bells, mailboxes or Post Office Boxes, those labels are for chattel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVtNy-kkdDM A PROPERLY EXERCISED USE OF U.S. POST OFFICE MAIL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tny2OXKiJOI A PROPERLY EXERCISED USE OF U.S. POST OFFICE MAIL PT. 2
COURT
http://annavonreitz.com/
Can’t have an article III (court of record, common law) court withOUT a national government. Those who purport there IS a lawful govt in hawaii, where is it??? Time to organize jural assemblies?
It’s all commerce, requiring us to consent to contract. Stay in the private ” i take the 5th (right to remain silent) without assistance of counsel”
Wrongdoers MUST be held liable, but procedure is critical….1. exhaust the administrative process 2. claims on the (public hazard) bonds of public servants and/or taking it to the international court for violating treaty (Article VI).
–Title 15 USC, Chapter 22, Section 1122 — Waiver of Sovereign Immunity — Corporate entity
To obtain equal protection under the law under the United States Codes, Title 28, Part VI, Chapter 171, § 2679 the Exclusiveness of remedy allows de-facto foreign agents to be sued as a corporate entity pursuant to Title 15 USC, Chapter 22, Section 1122 by which the liabilities of the state acknowledge the“waiver of Sovereign Immunity” of the USA:
(a) Waiver of sovereign immunity by the United States
The United States, all agencies and instrumentalities thereof, and all individuals, firms, corporations, other persons acting for the United States and with the authorization and consent of the United States, shall not be immune from suit in Federal or State court by any person, including any governmental or nongovernmental entity, for any violation under this chapter.
What are the attributes of an independent sovereign nation? Go back to the basics: People, land, jural assemblies, lawful currency, military (think surfer, paddlers)…..be creative like http://molossia.org/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtHCIXVb_eo Judges SLUSH Funds Illegal ? Part 1
https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-itnj/cris-court-registry-investment-system/
The United States Supreme Court functions actually as a “business”…. We know that the same is true for almost every other court in the world. Therefore, what we are dealing with is a false judicial system. And this leads to the “CRIS” accounts. The acronym CRIS (Court Registry Investment System) account is what connects a false judicial system to the bank; it is the mechanism through which they access funds that were created in your name without your knowledge.
And how exactly were these funds created? By treating your birth certificate as a financial instrument. For more info on the Birth Certificate, https://itnjcommittee.org/did-you-know/your-birth-certificate/
Legal researchers Jeanette Triplett and Rod Class located the documents that prove our courts are a branch of the Federal Reserve banking cartel.
https://itnjcommittee.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf
Commingling law forms are a trespass on the public side and are dangerous.
1795 U.S. Supreme Court decision which states in part: “In as much as every government is an artificial [manmade] person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only; a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary [invented], having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed [barred] from creating and attaining parity [equality] with the tangible [physical]. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” See also: CRUDEN v. NEALE 2N.C. (1796) 2 SE 70 “Every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent
“In as much as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the MIND ONLY with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that NO government, as well as any law agency, aspect, court, etc., can concern itself with anything other than Corporate, Artificial Persons and the Contracts between them.” (emphasis added). S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s
Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States 1795, [Not the “United States Supreme Court” -ed.]
http://commonlaw.5leek.com/ten-commercial-maxims-of-law.html
http://commonlaw.5leek.com/the-12-equitable-maxims.html
MISC :
http://commongood.earth/
g47marketplace.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaimsUkvgfk do you really understand the private side? Very good explanation
Government cannot be incorporated (profit making). Try putting in county of hawaii, state of hawaii, united states, etc.… https://www.dandb.com/search/?
Unless you were born in D.C. and knowingly, intelligently subject yourself to the jurisdiction, you’re most likely NOT a US citizen. You’re a Hawaiian, Californian, Texan, each are their own independent nations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08iGjlvJoUQ U.S. Citizens Have No Rights with Prime Minister David Williams
http://annavonreitz.com/uscitizenship.pdf
I have been following this matter of the deZayas letter with great interest and am very impressed with Ms. Ruggles awareness of it and how it may impact upon her and other government officials. She is doing the right thing and following proper protocol.
Mr. Kamelamela needs to fulfill his obligation to provide assurance.
Living Testimony in Affidavit form, under affirmation of penalty of perjury (verified)
i, a private living wo/man, :smith : john, the undersigned, one of the people, make this Testimony/Declaration of Truth of my own free will, and i hereby affirm, declare that i am of lawful age and of sound mind and hereby attest that the information contained in this Testimony/Declaration is factual, correct and not misleading to the best of my knowledge. i claim that i am not a person/fiction/corporation/voter/taxpayer/officer/agent/shareholder/franchisee/resident/vessel/citizen created under the laws of the United States or any state, the District of Columbia, or any territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States or any foreign state or country public or private, domestic nor foreign, ab initio. i am not an enemy of the United States or any corporation created under the laws of the United States or any state, the District of Columbia, or any territory, commonwealth, or possession of the United States, or a foreign state or country public or private. Any presumption that i am any of the above or documentation implying any of the above, is fraudulent, illusionary, false representation of a matter of fact or a kind of artifice employed to deceive.
This Testimony/Declaration of Truth is lawful notification to all public servants including but not limited to, Joseph K. Kamelamela, acting corporation counsel; Valerie Pointdexter, Aaron Chung, Sue Leeloy, Eileen Ohara, Jen Ruggles, Maile David, Dru Kanuha, Karen Eoff, Tim Richards, acting counsel members; Mitch Roth, acting prosecutor; Russell Suzuki, acting attorney general; Nolan Espinda, acting director of Dept. of Public Safety; Peter Cabreros, acting warden (HCCC), Lester Oshiro, acting chief clerk/administrator; Paul Ferreira, acting police chief; David Ige, acting governor; Harry Kim, acting mayor; Deanna S. Sako, acting Director of Finance; Stan Sitko, Real Property Tax Administrator, Mark Recktenwald, acting Chief Justice; Greg Nakamura, acting Chief Judge, and is hereby created and mailed to you via the united States post office, pursuant to the Federal Constitution, specifically, the Bill of Rights, in particular, Amendments I, IV, V, VI, VII, IX and X, and the Declaration of Rights of the Hawaii State Constitution, in particular, Article 1, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 18, and 20, also pursuant to your oaths of office and bonds. Whoever, being a public official, is or acts as an agent of a foreign principal required to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, and made available for public inspection in accordance with section 6 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938 (22 USCS §616]. i require your written rebuttal to me, specific to each and every point of the subject matter stated herein, within 20 days, via your own sworn and notarized affidavit, using fact, law and evidence to support your rebuttal of the specific subject matter stated in this Affidavit/Declaration. You are hereby noticed that your failure to respond, as stipulated, and rebut, with particularity and specificity, anything with which you disagree in this Affidavit/Declaration, is your lawful, legal and binding agreement with and admission to the fact that everything attested to in this Affidavit/Declaration is true, factual, correct, legal, lawful, and fully binding upon you in any court in America and/or international courts of justice, without your protest or objection, or that of those who represent you. Your silence is your acquiescence. [Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391]. Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.” [U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F. 2d. 297.] “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” You swore an oath to uphold and support the Constitution for the united States of America and the Constitution of Hawaii, and pursuant to your oaths, you are required to abide by that oath in the performance of your official duties as public servants. You have no Constitutional or other valid authority to defy the Constitutions, to which you owe your LIMITED authority, delegated to you by and through the People, and to which you swore your oaths. By your unlawful actions, specifically enumerated and described below, you acted in sedition and insurrection against the Constitutions, both federal and state, violated treaty laws (supreme law of the land) and committed treason against the People.
Notice to principal is notice to agent, notice to agent is notice to principal.
The following are statements of fact rebuttable only by verified affidavit:
1- A Scottish corporation calling itself “The United States of America, Inc.” and a Delaware corporation calling itself the “United States of America, Inc.” have been usurping the American Government masquerading as a constitutional republic since ~1868.
http://annavonreitz.com/howyouweredefrauded.pdf
2- To incorporate is to agree to submit to some other corporation or entity. A corporation is limited to powers and authorities of the entity under which it is incorporated. Corporations and their agents only have jurisdiction over other corporations, not over living people.
-28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
-The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia. “Corp. U.S.”
http://annavonreitz.com/public-order-blank-1.pdf
3- The Data Universal Numbering System is a business identification database where corporations are registered, including US corporate government and its major agencies.
-https://scannedretina.com/2015/07/11/us-corp-national-franchise-state-and-city-branches-duns-numbers/
-https://scannedretina.com/2015/07/11/us-corp-and-some-agencies-db-numbers-used-to-impersonate-the-lawful-government-of-the-american-people/
https://dandb.com/search/?country=US&keyword=county+of+hawaii&state=HI&type=cos&submit=Search+Now
4- All three levels of the United States “Federal Government” have been rendered incompetent. The actual Federal Government is still dormant pending completion of its “reconstruction”. Both the Territorial and Municipal Government have gone bankrupt.
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20page%201.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20Mail%20Receipt%20.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/demand/Demand%20and%20Decree%20Proof%20of%20Mailing.pdf
http://annavonreitz.com/briefreportenglish.pdf
5- The “Agencies”, including the elected Governor, are NOT ‘Public officials’ responsible to the people. They are not organized under the Executive Branch.’ Rodney–Dale; Class v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 11 CV 1559, 2011
http://image.rayservers.com/rodney-dale-class-vs-UNITED-STATES/traffic_filing/_3.15.11%20Rod%20Filing%20Traffic%20Case%20NC.pdf
http://www.amendment-13.org/
6- Oaths of office relinquishes US citizenship; thus, oath takers are acting as foreign agents and are required to file with the Attorney General.
People v. Vaughn, 196 Cal.App.2d 622, 16 Cal. Rptr. 711. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 911 et seq
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1481
(a) A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality—
(2) taking an oath or making an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a political subdivision thereof
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/612
No person shall act as an agent of a foreign principal unless he has filed with the Attorney General a true and complete registration statement and supplements.
7- The United States Supreme Court functions actually as a “business”. CRIS (Court Registry Investment System) account is what connects a false judicial system to the bank; it is the mechanism through which they access funds that were created in people’s names without their knowledge.
https://itnjcommittee.org/why-the-itnj/cris-court-registry-investment-system/
8- County, state, and federal governments keep a hidden, second set of books, CAFR, to defraud and steal from people: http://cafr1.com
9- The unincorporated Hawaiian government was illegally and unlawfully occupied by the private corporation, United States, through force.
UNITED STATES PUBLIC LAW 103-150, 103d Congress Joint Resolution 19, Nov. 23, 1993
“Whereas, the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, The Congress
(3) apologizes to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the people of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii on January 17, 1893 with the participation of agents and citizens of the United States, and the deprivation of the rights of Native Hawaiians to self-determination;
(4) expresses its commitment to acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, in order to provide a proper foundation for reconciliation between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people; and
(5) urges the President of the United States to also acknowledge the ramifications of the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii and to support reconciliation efforts between the United States and the Native Hawaiian people.
10- No Treay of Annexation exists.
http://www.hawaii-nation.org/treatyprot.html
Official Protest to the Treaty of Annexation, Presented by Lili`uokalani in Washington D.C., June 17, 1897
11- Treaties are the supreme law of the land, Article VI of the Constitution
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlevi
“…and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”
-http://www.hawaii-nation.org/treaty1849.html
12- The Motu Proprio issued by the Pope on July 11th, 2013, (Roman Curia being the highest legal instrument of all corporations world wide) decree that all corporations and their agents have no immunity.
-http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-proprio_20130711_organi-giudiziari.html
-https://www.gold-shield-alliance.com/papal_decree
13- The bankrupt, incompetent, private corporations, “The United States of America, Inc.”, “United States, Inc.”, “UNITED STATES, INC”, “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC”, and all subsidiaries, all sub corporations and all “State” franchises, have no jurisdiction within the Hawaiian Islands, an independent sovereign nation. These corporations are engaging in war crimes without immunity since 1893.
Lawful notification has been provided. If you do not timely rebut the statements, declarations, charges and averments made in this Testimony/Affidavit/Declaration, then you agree with and admit to them. Pursuant to this lawful notification, if you disagree with anything stated in this Affidavit/Declaration of Truth, you are required to rebut that with which you disagree, with particularity, within thirty (30) days of receipt thereof, by means of your written, notarized affidavit of truth, based upon specific, relevant fact and valid, Constitutionally compliant law, specific to the Bill of Rights, to support your disagreement. Along with your rebuting Affidavit, you are required to provide a certified copy of your Oath of Office; public hazard bond information including contact, badge # if applicable; Foreign Agent Registration, evidence that HRS/public policies/codes and the corresponding enacting clauses that lawfully support them, are not repugnant to the Constitution specific to the Bill of Rights, not in violation to Treaties, and that they apply to private living people. I reserve my unlimited, unalienable right not to be compelled to perform to the terms of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement that i did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. Furthermore, i do not accept nor consent to the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement.
Your failure to respond, as stipulated, is your agreement with and admission to the fact that everything in this Testimony/Affidavit/Declaration of Truth is true, correct, legal, lawful, and is your irrevocable admission attesting to this, fully binding upon you in any court of law in America as well as internationa courts of law, without your protest, objection, applicable also to those who represent you.
Affiant/Aggrieved/Claimant further sayeth naught.
By:_______________________, L.S.
All Rights Reserved, without prejudice, UCC 1- 308
c/o 123 kamehameha street
hilo, hawaii, zip exempt, non-domestic, without the U.S.
JURAT
Hawaii }
} SA.
Subscribed and affirmed by :smith :john proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence before me, this ____ day of __________, 2018.
Autograph: _______________________________ Notary
My Commission Expires:_____________ (SEAL)
Address: _____________________________
_____________________________
Thank you Jen for taking this critical step and for leading with such intelligence and grace.
Stay your ground for the the people.
We believe in you✊
This can only be the beginning.
Your courage sets the example needed.
You need to step down. If you cannot COMPLETELY fulfill your duties and attend and vote at every meeting then why are we, the tax payers, keeping you in that position. You cannot tell me that after all this time you were NOT aware of the stated over throw of Hawaii. I find it amazing how this article was printed during the time of Liliuokalani’s birthday.
And if it need be known, yes I am Hawaiian AND Japanese AND Chinese AND American Indian AND oh yeah Caucasion.
Step down…it looks like you’re being used to achieve an agenda. Are you colleagues on the same band wagon as you?